Indexed competition

ADCC Amateur World Championship 2025

PL · 17 May 2025

Matches: 641
Divisions: 57
Athletes: 686

Top 100 participants Confirmed athletes in the current official overall top 100, grouped by division.

Athlete	Overall rank
Boys 11-12 years / Boys 11-12 years / -32 kg
Bruce Broekhuizen Ruthless Fight Company	#4
Boys 11-12 years / Boys 11-12 years / -50 kg
Nikita Skalevskyi Triangle Jiu-Jitsu Münster	#20
Boys 7-8 years / Boys 7-8 years / -28 kg
Nathan Ambach Alpha Sports MMA	#3
Boys 9-10 years / Boys 9-10 years / -24 kg
Jan Rác 5th Dimension BJJ	#28
Boys 9-10 years / Boys 9-10 years / -28 kg
Alexander Ciornii Ratiborets Vienna	#17
Jiří Polzer Ultimate Gym Brno	#47
Boys 9-10 years / Boys 9-10 years / -36 kg
Kris Bruce Kerssies Ruthless Fight Company	#2

Competition day

Match schedule and recent results

Estimated start times update every minute on the event day. New or corrected results remain here for 30 minutes.

0 matches with a known athlete

Match schedule and recent results
Time	Athlete 1	Athlete 2	Result	Division

No scheduled matches or recent results are available.

Event record

All match results

401

All match results
Time	Athlete 1	Athlete 2	Result	Division
2025-05-18 08:59 M2	Kavin Kopperunko	Eliav Gurilashvili	Pts 2-0	Boys 13-14 years / Boys 13-14 years / -40 kg

2025-05-18 · 08:59 M2

Kavin Kopperunko (Win) Eliav Gurilashvili (Loss)

Pts 2-0

Boys 13-14 years / Boys 13-14 years / -40 kg

Athlete results

W–L by athlete

The event score (0–100) is 50% the result and 50% the opponent’s native-format level in the last valid publication before the event, measured against the model’s fixed neutral prior reference. If that native rating is missing, a provisional midpoint is used. The displayed range changes only those missing ratings; it is not a confidence interval. An opposite-format rating may appear as context but does not change the score or range. Opponents count equally within each supported format, then Gi and No-Gi count equally. Equal rounded scores share a provisional place. The athlete’s own rating is not used, and rating coverage does not claim every source match was imported.

246

W–L by athlete
Position	Athletes	Win	Loss	Score	Sub wins	Points wins	Other / unknown	Mat time
1	Achilles Servis Mannaz MMA Plymouth	3	0	75 ^* 50–100	2	1	0	11:00 Avg 03:40
1	Adel Grinkova Vigor Sport Club	1	0	75 ^* 50–100	1	0	0	03:06 Avg 03:06
1	Alexandr Boiatiuc Wolfpack Academy	3	0	75 ^* 50–100	2	1	0	07:16 Avg 02:25
1	Alexandr Boiatiuc Wolfpack Academy	4	0	75 ^* 50–100	3	1	0	09:41 Avg 02:25
1	Artur Vartikyan PIRATES ROLLING HQ	4	0	75 ^* 50–100	4	0	0	08:37 Avg 02:09
1	Cersac Damir ZR TEAM ASSOCIATION	1	0	75 ^* 50–100	1	0	0
1	Cersac Darius ZR TEAM ASSOCIATION	4	0	75 ^* 50–100	4	0	0	01:27 Avg 00:29
1	Daniil Tupikin Piranha jiu-jitsu	2	0	75 ^* 50–100	1	1	0	05:02 Avg 02:31
1	Eliza Kozdrańska COPACABANA FIGHT CLUB	3	0	75 ^* 50–100	1	2	0	12:24 Avg 04:08
1	Eva German Isr Grappling	1	0	75 ^* 50–100	1	0	0	00:38 Avg 00:38
1	Ewa Karpińska RIO GRAPPLING CLUB POLAND	2	0	75 ^* 50–100	1	1	0	09:58 Avg 04:59
1	Gorm Vedeler Nesodden Grappling	3	0	75 ^* 50–100	0	3	0	15:00 Avg 05:00
1	Istamul Taisumov Champions Factory	2	0	75 ^* 50–100	2	0	0	05:18 Avg 02:39
1	Ivan Demydov Forca Brava Dragon's Den Ze Radiola Team Poland	4	0	75 ^* 50–100	3	1	0	09:13 Avg 02:18
1	Ivan Marchenko PROJJ	4	0	75 ^* 50–100	4	0	0	01:25 Avg 00:28
1	Izabella Elnikova Fernando Yamasaki	2	0	75 ^* 50–100	1	1	0	05:42 Avg 02:51
1	Jacob Sorgjerd Frontline Academy Oslo-HQ	2	0	75 ^* 50–100	2	0	0	00:23 Avg 00:12
1	Jakub Ramulewicz BJJ Academy Zgorzelec	1	0	75 ^* 50–100	1	0	0	06:35 Avg 06:35
1	Kathy Foy Éire Grapple	2	0	75 ^* 50–100	1	1	0	07:58 Avg 03:59
1	Kavin Kopperunko JSJ-ACADEMY	2	0	75 ^* 50–100	1	1	0	07:29 Avg 03:45
1	Matas Žilys SMAUGLYS	4	0	75 ^* 50–100	2	2	0	15:20 Avg 03:50
1	Matvii Artsimovych BJJ Academy Zgorzelec	4	0	75 ^* 50–100	0	4	0	20:00 Avg 05:00
1	Miłosz Buszujew BJJ Academy Zgorzelec	4	0	75 ^* 50–100	3	1	0	12:22 Avg 03:06
1	Natalia Polovinko BJJ Hildesheim	1	0	75 ^* 50–100	0	1	0	05:00 Avg 05:00
1	Oliver Crestin ON-TOP MOLDOVA	4	0	75 ^* 50–100	4	0	0	04:33 Avg 01:08
1	Salakhuddin Bulhakov JSJ ACADEMY	2	0	75 ^* 50–100	2	0	0	06:03 Avg 03:02
1	Sviatoslav Malafii Draculino Trinec	4	0	75 ^* 50–100	2	2	0	17:32 Avg 04:23
1	Tamar Herrmann Isr Grappling	1	0	75 ^* 50–100	0	1	0	05:00 Avg 05:00
1	VARVARA BONDARENKO Bullterrier Fight Club	2	0	75 ^* 50–100	1	1	0	07:00 Avg 07:00
1	Yaroslav Prus Piranha jiu-jitsu	3	0	75 ^* 50–100	3	0	0	08:02 Avg 02:41
1	Yuriy Barskyy Intelligent jiu-jitsu academy (Ternopil)	1	0	75 ^* 50–100	0	1	0	07:00 Avg 07:00
1	Денис Умнов Checkmat KANИN Team	1	0	75 ^* 50–100	0	1	0	04:00 Avg 04:00
1	Юрій Лаврук СК ТИГР	3	0	75 ^* 50–100	1	2	0	10:14 Avg 03:25
34	Devid Sanaia Sport Club Achilles (Finland)	3	1	62.5 ^* 37.5–87.5	3	0	0	13:32 Avg 03:23
34	Nikita Skalevskyi Triangle Jiu-Jitsu Münster	3	1	62.5 ^* 37.5–87.5	2	1	0	12:11 Avg 03:03
34	Nikodem Niemiec Grappling Kraków	3	1	62.5 ^* 37.5–87.5	2	1	0	08:51 Avg 02:13
34	Unknown User AIGA KAZAKHSTAN	3	1	62.5 ^* 37.5–87.5	2	0	1	08:52 Avg 02:13
34	Дияр Жоламан ALTAIR	3	1	62.5 ^* 37.5–87.5	3	0	0	09:47 Avg 02:27
34	Мария Полторак Fernando Yamasaki	3	1	62.5 ^* 37.5–87.5	2	1	0	15:32 Avg 03:53
34	Мирас Курымбаев ALTAIR	3	1	62.5 ^* 37.5–87.5	2	1	0	11:09 Avg 02:47
41	Alexandru Lupan Wolfpack Academy	2	1	58.3 ^* 33.3–83.3	1	0	1	03:35 Avg 01:48
41	Danielle Haklai Isr Grappling	2	1	58.3 ^* 33.3–83.3	2	0	0	10:16 Avg 03:25
41	Dario Mikel AOGG Jiu-Jitsu	2	1	58.3 ^* 33.3–83.3	1	1	0	08:48 Avg 02:56
41	David Asailov Isr Grappling	2	1	58.3 ^* 33.3–83.3	2	0	0	07:42 Avg 02:34
41	Dumitru Gaidasenco Wolfpack Academy	2	1	58.3 ^* 33.3–83.3	0	2	0	10:54 Avg 03:38
41	Eldar Kukharenko Jungle BJJ Prague	2	1	58.3 ^* 33.3–83.3	2	0	0	08:53 Avg 02:58
41	Itamar Bert Isr Grappling	2	1	58.3 ^* 33.3–83.3	0	2	0	12:46 Avg 04:15
41	Jan Kvasnička DSC GYM CESKA TREBOVA	2	1	58.3 ^* 33.3–83.3	2	0	0	04:03 Avg 01:21
41	Kai Ewen SBG Aberdeen	2	1	58.3 ^* 33.3–83.3	0	2	0	13:15 Avg 04:25
41	Lenny Boaron Isr Grappling	2	1	58.3 ^* 33.3–83.3	1	1	0	08:09 Avg 02:43

Team performance

Academy results

The academy score uses the same result, native pre-event opponent rating and missing-rating range, then gives every athlete with an assessable external result equal weight. A numbered academy position requires at least three assessed athletes and a complete team basis. The # column is the position by calculated score. Historical support is the weighted share of opponent ratings that met the publication evidence rules; it is descriptive, not a confidence percentage. Matches between teammates stay outside the score; W-L and mat time still include them.

Athlete coverage compares scored public athletes with active public participants in indexed youth divisions. Rating coverage concerns valid indexed outcomes only and does not claim every source match was imported.

A match side without one clear academy registration is omitted. Unknown formats and matches without two clear academy registrations remain unassessed. A missing native opponent rating uses the provisional midpoint and widens the displayed range.

230

Academy results
#	Academy	W	L	S	P	X	Mat time
—	1/1 athlete assessed BJJ Hildesheim Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	0	0	1	0	05:00

—	1/2 athlete assessed COPACABANA FIGHT CLUB Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	3	0	1	2	0	12:24

—	1/2 athlete assessed Draculino Trinec Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	4	0	2	2	0	17:32

—	1/3 athlete assessed Frontline Academy Oslo-HQ Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	2	0	2	0	0	00:23

—	1/1 athlete assessed JSJ-ACADEMY Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	2	0	1	1	0	07:29

—	1/1 athlete assessed Mannaz MMA Plymouth Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	3	0	2	1	0	11:00

—	1/1 athlete assessed Nesodden Grappling Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	3	0	0	3	0	15:00

—	2/2 athletes assessed Piranha jiu-jitsu Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	5	0	4	1	0	13:04

—	1/1 athlete assessed PIRATES ROLLING HQ Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	4	0	4	0	0	08:37

—	1/1 athlete assessed Vigor Sport Club Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	0	1	0	0	03:06

—	2/3 athletes assessed ZR TEAM ASSOCIATION Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	5	0	5	0	0	01:27

—	1/1 athlete assessed Éire Grapple Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	2	0	1	1	0	07:58

—	2/2 athletes assessed СК ТИГР Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	5	1	1	4	0	21:40

—	1/1 athlete assessed AIGA KAZAKHSTAN Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	3	1	2	0	1	08:52

—	2/6 athletes assessed ALTAIR Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	6	2	5	1	0	20:56

—	4/4 athletes assessed BJJ Academy Zgorzelec Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	9	1	4	5	0	41:08

—	2/2 athletes assessed Forca Brava Dragon's Den Ze Radiola Team Poland Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	5	1	4	1	0	13:26

—	1/1 athlete assessed Grappling Kraków Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	3	1	2	1	0	08:51

—	1/1 athlete assessed Triangle Jiu-Jitsu Münster Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	3	1	2	1	0	12:11

—	1/1 athlete assessed GRACIE BARRA (POLAND) Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	2	1	2	0	0	05:39

—	1/1 athlete assessed Iron Grip Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	2	1	2	0	0	03:48

—	1/1 athlete assessed Jiu-Jitsu Academy Bratislava Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	2	1	1	0	1	05:48

—	1/1 athlete assessed Oni Böblingen Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	2	1	2	0	0	09:04

—	1/1 athlete assessed SBG Aberdeen Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	2	1	0	2	0	13:15

—	7/11 athletes assessed Wolfpack Academy Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	14	6	8	5	1	56:32

—	2/2 athletes assessed Jungle BJJ Prague Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	3	2	3	0	0	12:33

—	2/3 athletes assessed Usman Fight Club Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	3	2	2	1	0	10:37

—	3/3 athletes assessed Checkmat KANИN Team Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	3	2	2	1	0	14:39

—	5/5 athletes assessed Fernando Yamasaki Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	8	5	4	4	0	42:37

—	1/1 athlete assessed A-Force BJJ Kaunas Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	1	1	0	0	05:16

—	1/2 athlete assessed Advance JJ Alliance Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	1	1	0	0	00:34

—	1/1 athlete assessed Atos Germany Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	1	0	1	0	10:00

—	1/1 athlete assessed CHECKMAT INTERNATIONAL Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	1	0	1	0	10:00

—	1/1 athlete assessed Fighting gym Topoľčany Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	1	1	0	0	00:28

—	2/2 athletes assessed Intelligent jiu-jitsu academy (Ternopil) Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	1	0	1	0	12:00

—	2/2 athletes assessed JSJ ACADEMY Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	2	1	2	0	0	07:14

—	1/1 athlete assessed KMC Smauglys Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	1	0	1	0	12:00

—	2/3 athletes assessed Marga BJJ Garwolin Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	2	2	2	0	0	08:08

—	2/2 athletes assessed PROJJ Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	4	1	4	0	0	03:57

—	1/1 athlete assessed Rio Grappling Club Częstochowa Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	1	1	0	0	08:37

—	1/2 athlete assessed Rumble Sports Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	1	0	0	1	08:11

—	1/1 athlete assessed Shark Top Team Bytom Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	1	0	1	0	04:27

—	1/1 athlete assessed Team Kaishin HQ Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	1	1	0	0	05:20

—	1/2 athlete assessed Zenith Bjj Gameness Team Poznań Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	1	1	0	0	01:07

—	1/1 athlete assessed ŠK BEST FITNESS SENEC Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	1	1	1	0	0	04:42

—	5/7 athletes assessed ON-TOP MOLDOVA Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	8	6	7	0	1	32:00

—	3/3 athletes assessed AOGG Jiu-Jitsu Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	4	3	3	1	0	15:18

—	2/3 athletes assessed Ruthless Fight Company Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	3	4	3	0	0	16:09

—	5/5 athletes assessed SMAUGLYS Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	6	4	4	2	0	39:11

—	6/6 athletes assessed Bullterrier Fight Club Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage. The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty. No academy position: privacy choices prevent a complete team basis. No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.	5	5	3	2	0	23:09

Open eventpage

Boys 11-12 years / Boys 11-12 years / -32 kg

Boys 11-12 years / Boys 11-12 years / -50 kg

Boys 7-8 years / Boys 7-8 years / -28 kg

Boys 9-10 years / Boys 9-10 years / -24 kg

Boys 9-10 years / Boys 9-10 years / -28 kg

Boys 9-10 years / Boys 9-10 years / -36 kg

Match schedule and recent results

All match results

Kavin Kopperunko (Win) – Eliav Gurilashvili (Loss)

W–L by athlete

Academy results

Kavin Kopperunko (Win) Eliav Gurilashvili (Loss)