TopBJJ Index Youth

TopBJJ Index

Search TopBJJ Index
Language selector
Menu

Indexed competition

CRITÉRIUM NATIONAL KIDS

FR · 4 December 2021

Matches
446
Divisions
136
Athletes
250
Top 100 participants Confirmed athletes in the current official overall top 100, grouped by division.

No confirmed top 100 participants are registered for this competition.

Event record

All match results

440
All match results
Time Athlete 1 Athlete 2 Result Division
Lilas Legrand Isys Zadi
Pts 0-20
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U9 (2012/2013) / -35 / Débutant (beginner)
Farah Khamrichi Myriam DYA
Pts 4-0
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U11 (2010/2011) / -50 / Non débutant (no beginner)
Abu'bakr Allouache Lina Baudoin
Pts 2-6
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U11 (2010/2011) / -35 / Débutant (beginner)
Yoni Proisy Aboubakar Hanafir
Pts 6-2
tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -25 / Non débutant (no beginner)
Antonin HOUARD AYMEN DKHISSI
Pts 0-17
tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U11 (2010/2011) / -45 / Non débutant (no beginner)
Nora BENESSALAH Seena Benidir
Pts 5-0
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -30 / Débutant (beginner)
Carmina Martinez Maryam Allouache
Pts 2-6
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U11 (2010/2011) / -35 / Débutant (beginner)
Axelle DELVILLE Sohane Lekbir
Pts 2-0
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U11 (2010/2011) / -50 / Non débutant (no beginner)
Vassily Petite Kaminski Jérémy ROBERT
WO
tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -20 / Débutant (beginner)
Aymen Mohamed Ben Mimoun Syrine Moumeni
Pts 2-2
tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -25 / Non débutant (no beginner)
Tasnym SELVE Seena Benidir
Pts 8-2
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U9 (2012/2013) / -30 / Débutant (beginner)
Esteban Rosa Mustapha Fatihi
DQ -- 0-0
tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U11 (2010/2011) / -35 / Débutant (beginner)
Bilal Sahmoudi Eden BAKEL
Pts 5-0
(tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -25 / Débutant (beginner) GROUPE 3
HAFSA OUEDRAOGO DJANAELLE SANON
Pts 0-2
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U11 (2010/2011) / -55 / Non débutant (no beginner)
ASSIA MAJICH Maryem Lacene-necer
Dec 0-0
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U9 (2012/2013) / -30 / Non débutant (no beginner)
Myriam GUERNA KA-HONI BOUVIER
WO
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U9 (2012/2013) / -30 / Non débutant (no beginner)
Noor Kochat Siham Chouni
Pts 2-9
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U11 (2010/2011) / -40 / Débutant (beginner)
Nora BENESSALAH Laaroussi Myriam
Pts 0-9
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U9 (2012/2013) / -30 / Débutant (beginner) GROUPE 2
Ways BERRAHMOUN Raphaël Farnault
Pts 0-8
(tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -25 / Débutant (beginner) GROUPE 3
Taymiya SELVE Diana Gouveia
WO
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -25 / Débutant (beginner)
Sohane Lekbir Myriam DYA
Pts 12-0
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U11 (2010/2011) / -50 / Non débutant (no beginner)
KA-HONI BOUVIER Maryem Lacene-necer
WO
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U9 (2012/2013) / -30 / Non débutant (no beginner)
Maryam Allouache Lina Baudoin
Pts 2-0
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U11 (2010/2011) / -35 / Débutant (beginner)
Unknown User Seena Benidir
WO
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -30 / Débutant (beginner)
Élodie Legrand Diana Gouveia
Dec 0-0
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -25 / Débutant (beginner)
Axelle DELVILLE Farah Khamrichi
Pts 0-5
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U11 (2010/2011) / -50 / Non débutant (no beginner)
Carmina Martinez Abu'bakr Allouache
Pts 0-14
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U11 (2010/2011) / -35 / Débutant (beginner)
Myriam GUERNA Lou Michaïlesco
Pts 9-0
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U9 (2012/2013) / -30 / Débutant (beginner) GROUPE 2
Aboubakar Hanafir Adam STEPHAN
Pts 2-2
tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -25 / Non débutant (no beginner)
Lisa Ghanem - - Devauchelle Unknown User
Pts 0-10
tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U11 (2010/2011) / -45 / Débutant (beginner)
Mayssa Launay Naelle Bouhacene
Pts 2-12
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U11 (2010/2011) / -55 / Débutant (beginner)
Tasnym SELVE Sélène Keriou
Pts 9-0
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U9 (2012/2013) / -30 / Débutant (beginner)
Thomas De Villanova Lohann PLANQUE
Pts 0-5
tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U9 (2012/2013) / -45 / Non débutant (no beginner)
Élodie Legrand Taymiya SELVE
WO
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -25 / Débutant (beginner)
Aymen Mohamed Ben Mimoun Yoni Proisy
Pts 8-4
tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -25 / Non débutant (no beginner)
TASNIME DKHISSI Gabriel Dhennin
Pts 5-6
tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U9 (2012/2013) / -40 / Non débutant (no beginner)
Céleste DESOBRY Ciana Lheureux
Pts 0-4
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U11 (2010/2011) / -30 / Non débutant (no beginner)
Raphaël Farnault Eden BAKEL
Pts 7-2
(tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -25 / Débutant (beginner) GROUPE 3
Unknown User Nora BENESSALAH
WO
tournoi GI / filles (girls) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -30 / Débutant (beginner)
Ways BERRAHMOUN Bilal Sahmoudi
Pts 0-2
(tournoi GI / garçons (boys) / U7 (2014/2015/2016/2017) / -25 / Débutant (beginner) GROUPE 3

Athlete results

W–L by athlete

The event score (0–100) is 50% the result and 50% the opponent’s native-format level in the last valid publication before the event, measured against the model’s fixed neutral prior reference. If that native rating is missing, a provisional midpoint is used. The displayed range changes only those missing ratings; it is not a confidence interval. An opposite-format rating may appear as context but does not change the score or range. Opponents count equally within each supported format, then Gi and No-Gi count equally. Equal rounded scores share a provisional place. The athlete’s own rating is not used, and rating coverage does not claim every source match was imported.

228
W–L by athlete
Position Athletes Win Loss Score Sub wins Points wins Other / unknown Mat time
1 Abdallah Labed Z BJJ PLAYERS 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 03:00 Avg 03:00
1 Abdul Gilbert Gadjiyev Delariva Nantes 6 0 75 * 50–100 0 6 0 11:17 Avg 01:53
1 Adam SADKI VLB TEAM 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 02:00 Avg 02:00
1 Adem ROBERT Kumiteteam 1 0 75 * 50–100 1 0 0 02:18 Avg 02:18
1 Ahmet DOGANAY FONTENAY SOUS BOIS JIU JITSU BRESILIEN (FSB JJB) 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 1 03:00 Avg 03:00
1 Anis Hannan MMA FACTORY 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 1 02:00 Avg 02:00
1 Aymen Mennella FIGHTING BEAT 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 02:54 Avg 01:27
1 Ayoub Si Ali BOISSY ACTION SPORT EDUCATION 94 "BASE 94" 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 04:00 Avg 04:00
1 Aïssa SEGHIRI FIGHTING BEAT 4 0 75 * 50–100 0 3 1 06:00 Avg 02:00
1 Benkhelfallah Ilyes team-nso 3 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 1 03:00 Avg 01:30
1 Bilal Sahmoudi team-nso 7 0 75 * 50–100 0 7 0 10:30 Avg 01:30
1 Charif Jiadi @ GRAPPLING GENNEVILLIERS 2 0 75 * 50–100 1 1 0 01:27 Avg 01:27
1 Ciana Lheureux GSDI 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 03:01 Avg 01:31
1 Curtis Allion DISTRICT TRAINING ZONE (DTZ) 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 03:00 Avg 03:00
1 Da Silva Caldeireiro Thiago MMA FACTORY 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 03:38 Avg 01:49
1 Djamal Abasov Moka Team 443 3 0 75 * 50–100 3 0 0 06:53 Avg 02:18
1 DJANAELLE SANON VLB TEAM 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 02:00 Avg 02:00
1 Farah Khamrichi ASC59 4 0 75 * 50–100 0 4 0 08:00 Avg 02:00
1 Gabriel Dhennin Z BJJ PLAYERS 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 02:00 Avg 02:00
1 Hamza Benghalem ASSOCIATION TEAM-N.S.O · team-nso 3 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 1 04:00 Avg 02:00
1 Houdhayfa MAJICH VLB TEAM 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 0 1
1 Ilyan Hannan MMA FACTORY 4 0 75 * 50–100 0 4 0 08:00 Avg 02:00
1 Imran Tamouret BOISSY ACTION SPORT EDUCATION 94 "BASE 94" 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 01:30 Avg 01:30
1 Inaya Laribi team-nso 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0
1 ISLAM MAGOMEDKERIMOV Moka Team 443 6 0 75 * 50–100 0 4 2 08:00 Avg 02:00
1 Islam Sepiyev Moka Team 443 5 0 75 * 50–100 0 4 1 08:00 Avg 02:00
1 Ismail Sylla FIGHTING BEAT 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 01:30 Avg 01:30
1 Issa Brahimi TEAM MAGNUM ASSOCIATION LUTALIVRE MALAKOFF 4 0 75 * 50–100 0 4 0 05:54 Avg 01:58
1 Isys Zadi Spirit 3 0 75 * 50–100 0 3 0 06:00 Avg 02:00
1 Kais Mansouri TEAM MAGNUM ASSOCIATION LUTALIVRE MALAKOFF 3 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 1 05:43 Avg 01:54
1 Kalyssa Baizid TEAM SPIRIT 2 0 75 * 50–100 1 0 1 01:43 Avg 01:43
1 Karim Mansouri TEAM MAGNUM ASSOCIATION LUTALIVRE MALAKOFF 3 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 1 03:47 Avg 01:54
1 Kaïs Pineix Z BJJ PLAYERS 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 04:00 Avg 02:00
1 Laaroussi Myriam team-nso 5 0 75 * 50–100 0 5 0 08:30 Avg 01:42
1 Laroussi Ismael team-nso 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 02:00 Avg 02:00
1 Lenzo Zadi TEAM SPIRIT 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0
1 Lohann PLANQUE ASC59 4 0 75 * 50–100 0 4 0 08:00 Avg 02:00
1 Lyes Laroussi DISTRICT TRAINING ZONE (DTZ) 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0
1 Moussa Alexander DISTRICT TRAINING ZONE (DTZ) 3 0 75 * 50–100 1 2 0 05:18 Avg 02:39
1 Myriam EL ABBOUNI TEAM MAGNUM ASSOCIATION LUTALIVRE MALAKOFF 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 01:30 Avg 01:30
1 Naelle Bouhacene @ SPIRIT 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 02:00 Avg 02:00
1 Nathan Nguyen MKTEAM 4 0 75 * 50–100 0 3 1 04:58 Avg 01:39
1 Naïm Regredj TEAM SPIRIT 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 03:00 Avg 03:00
1 Oscar Woelfel TEAM SPIRIT 8 0 75 * 50–100 0 6 2 12:00 Avg 02:00
1 SHAHMIRZA MAGOMEDKERIMOV Moka Team 443 3 0 75 * 50–100 0 3 0 06:00 Avg 02:00
1 Tasnym SELVE ASC59 4 0 75 * 50–100 0 4 0 06:27 Avg 01:37
1 Tristan Nguyen MKTEAM 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 03:00 Avg 03:00
1 Unknown User BOISSY ACTION SPORT EDUCATION 94 "BASE 94" 4 0 75 * 50–100 0 4 0 08:00 Avg 02:00
1 Unknown User team-nso 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 1
1 Youcef Boudjelida team-nso 6 0 75 * 50–100 0 6 0 06:00 Avg 01:30

Team performance

Academy results

The academy score uses the same result, native pre-event opponent rating and missing-rating range, then gives every athlete with an assessable external result equal weight. A numbered academy position requires at least three assessed athletes and a complete team basis. The # column is the position by calculated score. Historical support is the weighted share of opponent ratings that met the publication evidence rules; it is descriptive, not a confidence percentage. Matches between teammates stay outside the score; W-L and mat time still include them.

Athlete coverage compares scored public athletes with active public participants in indexed youth divisions. Rating coverage concerns valid indexed outcomes only and does not claim every source match was imported.

A match side without one clear academy registration is omitted. Unknown formats and matches without two clear academy registrations remain unassessed. A missing native opponent rating uses the provisional midpoint and widens the displayed range.

40
Academy results
# Academy W L S P X Mat time
1
6/6 athletes assessed

MMA FACTORY

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

11 3 0 10 1 21:56
2
15/15 athletes assessed

ASC59

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

46 24 3 39 4 1:47:27
3
7/9 athletes assessed

Moka Team 443

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

22 17 3 15 4 42:53
4
3/3 athletes assessed

VIC Fight

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

7 4 0 5 2 17:00
5
4/4 athletes assessed

ASSOCIATION TEAM-N.S.O

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

12 10 0 9 3 31:00
5
17/18 athletes assessed

TEAM MAGNUM ASSOCIATION LUTALIVRE MALAKOFF

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

35 25 0 26 9 1:22:10
7
4/4 athletes assessed

Kumiteteam

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

5 4 1 4 0 11:18
8
29/32 athletes assessed

team-nso

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

79 66 0 64 15 3:21:40
9
9/9 athletes assessed

BOISSY ACTION SPORT EDUCATION 94 "BASE 94"

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

12 9 1 9 2 33:17
10
10/10 athletes assessed

Z BJJ PLAYERS

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

11 12 0 11 0 39:00
11
9/10 athletes assessed

TEAM SPIRIT

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

17 17 1 12 4 42:03
12
16/17 athletes assessed

MKTEAM

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

21 18 1 15 5 54:48
13
3/4 athletes assessed

@ GRAPPLING GENNEVILLIERS

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

4 3 1 3 0 10:28
14
9/10 athletes assessed

DISTRICT TRAINING ZONE (DTZ)

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

11 17 1 10 0 42:56
15
9/15 athletes assessed

@ SPIRIT

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

14 16 0 11 3 44:13
16
17/19 athletes assessed

FIGHTING BEAT

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

21 33 0 18 3 1:02:29
17
6/6 athletes assessed

Lutte

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

7 8 0 4 3 27:37
18
10/10 athletes assessed

Panda Supa Crew

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

22 37 0 15 7 1:24:42
19
5/5 athletes assessed

Les diables rouges Bagnolet

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

6 16 0 2 4 28:00
20
6/6 athletes assessed

ALMA DE LUTA

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

14 26 0 12 2 47:27
21
12/20 athletes assessed

VLB TEAM

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

This score band overlaps 20 other academies' bands. These bands do not resolve their relative order.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

8 22 0 6 2 55:00
—
1/1 athlete assessed

Delariva Nantes

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

6 0 0 6 0 11:17
—
1/1 athlete assessed

FONTENAY SOUS BOIS JIU JITSU BRESILIEN (FSB JJB)

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

2 0 0 1 1 03:00
—
1/1 athlete assessed

GSDI

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

2 0 0 2 0 03:01
—
1/1 athlete assessed

Spirit

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

3 0 0 3 0 06:00
—
2/2 athletes assessed

Origine Fight

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

10 2 0 10 0 18:00
—
1/1 athlete assessed

IDF - Montreuil RS

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

3 1 0 2 1 05:30
—
1/2 athlete assessed

FFLUTTE

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

2 1 0 1 1 04:00
—
2/2 athletes assessed

DEO JIU JITSU / CDK TEAM

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

7 7 0 7 0 24:00
—
1/1 athlete assessed

Mandala Jiu Jitsu School

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

2 2 0 1 1 02:00
—
1/1 athlete assessed

NOR - Dieppe

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

1 2 0 1 0 06:00
—
1/2 athlete assessed

Carlson Gracie Luxembourg

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

1 3 0 0 1
—
1/2 athlete assessed

IDF - Rueil-Malmaison RAC

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

1 6 0 0 1 06:00
—
1/1 athlete assessed

GGLL Luta Jitsu

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

0 2 0 0 0 03:38
—
1/1 athlete assessed

kumite mma

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

0 5 0 0 0
—
1/1 athlete assessed

Losf Grappling

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

0 1 0 0 0
—
1/1 athlete assessed

SPORT ATTITUDE 78

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

0 2 0 0 0
—
1/1 athlete assessed

ZBJJ PLAYERS

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

0 3 0 0 0 06:00
—
1/1 athlete assessed

ZR TEAM FRANCE

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

0 1 0 0 0
— 0 0 0 0 0

Open eventpage