TopBJJ Index Youth
Language selector
Menu

Indexed competition

NAGA Europe Grappling Championship

DE · 11 November 2023

Matches
540
Divisions
173
Athletes
346
Top 100 participants Confirmed athletes in the current official overall top 100, grouped by division.

Event record

All match results

402
All match results
Time Athlete 1 Athlete 2 Result Division
Nikolaj Bocicovar Artur Puskin
🥇 Pts 0-0
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 60 - 64.9 / 14-15 years
Alejandra Sanner Katharina Jost
🥇 Pts 6-2
Teens Gi (Female) / Expert / 60 - 64.9 / 14-15 years
Alexander Schudy Alexander Vinokourov
🥉 Pts 0-0
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 60 - 64.9 / 14-15 years
Chahid Akhlafa Yusuf Agca
🥉 Sub 01:42 0-1
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 70 - 74.9 / 16-17 years
Leon Fokin Amine Abdou
🥇 Sub -- 0-0
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 70 - 74.9 / 14-15 years
Blanka Mleczek Yasmine Lacatusu
🥇 Pts 2-0
Children Gi (Female) / Expert / 35 - 39.9 / 10-11 years
AKHMED MISLIMOV ULYSSE BOULIN BRAHIM
🥉 Sub 02:20 2-0
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 45 - 49.9 / 14-15 years
Merlijn Frieser Karl Saller
🥉 Pts 2-0
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 70 - 74.9 / 14-15 years
Gisele S. Yagües Alice Neve Dagostino
🥇 Pts 0-17
Children Gi (Female) / Expert / 45 - 49.9 / 12-13 years
Helena Senghaas Amin Gürbüz
🥉 Pts 0-2
Children Gi (Male) / Expert / 35 - 39.9 / 8-9 years
Igor Szczesny Yusuf Agca
Pts 5-2
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 70 - 74.9 / 16-17 years
Katharina Jost Anna Napp
🥉 WO
Teens Gi (Female) / Expert / 60 - 64.9 / 14-15 years
Semih Altindal Lewar Abdulkader
🥇 Sub 03:00 4-0
Teens Gi (Male) / Intermediate / 90 & Over / 16-17 years
Ghita Sofia Halamina Essaidi
🥉 Sub 02:38 7-0
Children Gi (Female) / Expert / 45 - 49.9 / 12-13 years
Iara Marinho Alejandra Sanner
🥇 Pts 0-5
Teens Gi (Female) / Expert / 55 - 59.9 / 14-15 years
Anna Napp Alejandra Sanner
WO
Teens Gi (Female) / Expert / 60 - 64.9 / 14-15 years
Sasha Dogaru Tyson Kwiatkowski
🥇 Sub 00:14 0-0
Children Gi (Male) / Expert / 35 - 39.9 / 8-9 years
Rojhat Sandbeck Jerome Kattler
🥇 Sub 02:32 3-0
Children Gi (Male) / Beginner / 40 - 44.9 / 12-13 years
Temirlan Valiyev Kacper Przybylski
🥇 Sub 01:09 3-0
Children Gi (Male) / Expert / 35 - 39.9 / 10-11 years
Giovanni La Delia Alexander Csip
🥇 Sub 02:52 0-7
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 50 - 54.9 / 14-15 years
Andrew Perez ULYSSE BOULIN BRAHIM
Pts 14-2
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 45 - 49.9 / 14-15 years
Fyn Wezenberg Gavin LeVan
🥉 Pts 6-0
Children Gi (Male) / Beginner / 40 - 44.9 / 12-13 years
Halamina Essaidi Alice Neve Dagostino
Sub 01:41 0-7
Children Gi (Female) / Expert / 45 - 49.9 / 12-13 years
Tyson Kwiatkowski Amin Gürbüz
Sub 00:41 0-0
Children Gi (Male) / Expert / 35 - 39.9 / 8-9 years
Aymen Mohamed Ben Mimoun Mahedine El Omari
🥇 Pts 0-0
Children Gi (Male) / Expert / 25 - 29.9 / 8-9 years
Bartosz Zaba Younes Belhassani
🥇 Sub 03:00 19-0
Children Gi (Male) / Beginner / 55 - 59.9 / 12-13 years
Artur Puskin Alexander Vinokourov
Pts 0-0
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 60 - 64.9 / 14-15 years
Alejandra Sanner Dana Laura Wulf
🥉 Pts 5-0
Teens Gi (Female) / Expert / 55 - 59.9 / 14-15 years
Vladislav Moskaljov Adam ALAOUI
🥇 Pts 4-5
Children Gi (Male) / Expert / 35 - 39.9 / 12-13 years
Sasha Dogaru Helena Senghaas
Sub 02:45 8-0
Children Gi (Male) / Expert / 35 - 39.9 / 8-9 years
ULYSSE BOULIN BRAHIM Justus Fuhs
🥉 WO
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 50 - 54.9 / 14-15 years
Rocco Tierney MATEO BRATULESCU
🥉 Sub 00:29 0-4
Children Gi (Male) / Expert / 25 - 29.9 / 8-9 years
Pécsi Szebasztián Samuel Škorec
🥉 WO
Children Gi (Male) / Expert / 35 - 39.9 / 12-13 years
Giovanni La Delia ULYSSE BOULIN BRAHIM
WO
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 50 - 54.9 / 14-15 years
Ghita Sofia Gisele S. Yagües
Sub 00:58 2-0
Children Gi (Female) / Expert / 45 - 49.9 / 12-13 years
Jerome Kattler Gavin LeVan
Pts 19-0
Children Gi (Male) / Beginner / 40 - 44.9 / 12-13 years
Alexander Schudy Nikolaj Bocicovar
Sub 01:56 4-0
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 60 - 64.9 / 14-15 years
Mykola Beshleha Allegra Elena Mazzella
🥇 Sub 02:36 0-4
Children Gi (Female) / Beginner / 25 - 29.9 / 6-7 years
DAVID AGANOV Malé VANBERSELAERT
🥇 Sub 01:44 0-0
Children Gi (Male) / Expert / 30 - 34.9 / 12-13 years
Assad Akhlafa George Udesiani
🥇 Pts 0-2
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 65 - 69.9 / 14-15 years
Aaron Zinnecker CRISTIAN POPA
🥇 Pts 6-0
Teens Gi (Male) / Beginner / 70 - 74.9 / 14-15 years
Alina Zmarandache Fabiola Marrero
🥉 Pts 0-6
Children Gi (Female) / Expert / 55 - 59.9 / 12-13 years
Mahedine El Omari MATEO BRATULESCU
Sub 00:35 0-0
Children Gi (Male) / Expert / 25 - 29.9 / 8-9 years
Justus Fuhs Alexander Csip
Sub 03:05 0-8
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 50 - 54.9 / 14-15 years
Illia Konko Alexander Vinokourov
Dec 0-0
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 60 - 64.9 / 14-15 years
Kahil Chouanine Juan Soler
🥇 Sub 02:13 14-0
Children Gi (Male) / Expert / 20 - 24.9 / 8-9 years
Rojhat Sandbeck Fyn Wezenberg
Sub 02:11 5-0
Children Gi (Male) / Beginner / 40 - 44.9 / 12-13 years
Amine Abdou Karl Saller
Pts 2-0
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 70 - 74.9 / 14-15 years
Ari Böhlert Romeo Arslan
🥇 Sub 03:00 0-6
Children Gi (Male) / Beginner / 45 - 49.9 / 12-13 years
Assad Akhlafa George Craig
No show
Teens Gi (Male) / Expert / 65 - 69.9 / 14-15 years

Athlete results

W–L by athlete

The event score (0–100) is 50% the result and 50% the opponent’s native-format level in the last valid publication before the event, measured against the model’s fixed neutral prior reference. If that native rating is missing, a provisional midpoint is used. The displayed range changes only those missing ratings; it is not a confidence interval. An opposite-format rating may appear as context but does not change the score or range. Opponents count equally within each supported format, then Gi and No-Gi count equally. Equal rounded scores share a provisional place. The athlete’s own rating is not used, and rating coverage does not claim every source match was imported.

258
W–L by athlete
Position Athletes Win Loss Score Sub wins Points wins Other / unknown Mat time
1 Aaron Zinnecker Martial Arts Diez e.V. 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 06:00 Avg 03:00
1 Abdullah Magomedov Hors Normes BJJ Rennes 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 03:00 Avg 03:00
1 Albert Hlaváček BulletproofJJ 1 0 75 * 50–100 1 0 0 02:54 Avg 02:54
1 Alejandra Sanner Matrix Jiu-Jitsu 4 0 75 * 50–100 1 3 0 13:56 Avg 03:29
1 Alexandru Catanoiu MatSide Romania 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 03:00 Avg 03:00
1 Alice Neve Dagostino Legacy Art Of Fighting 3 0 75 * 50–100 1 2 0 05:41 Avg 02:51
1 Amy-Lynn Barsoe Nexus Fighter Academy 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 0 1 03:00 Avg 03:00
1 Amy Cumpelik Delariva Germany 2 0 75 * 50–100 1 1 0 03:53 Avg 01:57
1 Archie Harcarik Apex Jiu-Jitsu 3 0 75 * 50–100 1 2 0 09:32 Avg 03:11
1 Bartosz Zaba Martial Arts Diez e.V. 4 0 75 * 50–100 2 2 0 12:00 Avg 03:00
1 Ben Gentgen JII ON DU 2 0 75 * 50–100 1 1 0 06:00 Avg 03:00
1 Bilal Elsayev AZ PERFORMANCE 2 0 75 * 50–100 2 0 0 01:09 Avg 00:35
1 Blanka Mleczek Linke Bros Academy 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 03:32 Avg 03:32
1 Daniel Gennaro Lottatori Milano 4 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 2 09:57 Avg 02:29
1 Dmytro Ryzhkov WingTsun Gera 2 0 75 * 50–100 1 1 0 03:10 Avg 01:35
1 Eva Liste Aguilera Jiu Jitsu 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 06:00 Avg 03:00
1 Freddy Blane 5th Element Durham 4 0 75 * 50–100 4 0 0 04:54 Avg 01:14
1 GADJIMURAD AKMEDOV Moka Team 443 4 0 75 * 50–100 4 0 0 06:46 Avg 01:42
1 Gökmen Dogan Alliance Frankfurt am Main 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 06:00 Avg 03:00
1 Hannah Fuhs GFTeam Academia Braunschweig 4 0 75 * 50–100 2 1 1 11:29 Avg 02:52
1 Igor Szczesny Osada Jiu Jitsu - Judo 3 0 75 * 50–100 1 2 0 10:50 Avg 03:37
1 Ihsan Guerard fightcamp 2 0 75 * 50–100 2 0 0 04:29 Avg 02:15
1 Ilies Nour NSM TEAM 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 06:00 Avg 03:00
1 Jakob Rau JII ON DU 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 06:00 Avg 03:00
1 Jose Hoffmann SCHMITZ TEAM 1 0 75 * 50–100 1 0 0 02:28 Avg 02:28
1 Kahil Chouanine NrFight Paris 4 0 75 * 50–100 4 0 0 10:13 Avg 02:33
1 Leni Charlotte Annemarie Chilla Top Brother Europe 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 03:00 Avg 03:00
1 Luana Taleb strike & grapple 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 03:00 Avg 03:00
1 Marius Hockenjos BJJ Burghausen 3 0 75 * 50–100 2 0 1 06:17 Avg 02:06
1 Mariusz Linke Linke Bros Academy 2 0 75 * 50–100 1 1 0 06:36 Avg 03:18
1 Martin Silin Combat Center Schwarzenbek 2 0 75 * 50–100 2 0 0 01:53 Avg 00:57
1 Otto Hauxner Enochsen Renegade MMA 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 06:00 Avg 03:00
1 Pelle Medrow Berserkers Team Magdeburg 1 0 75 * 50–100 0 1 0 04:00 Avg 04:00
1 Rojhat Sandbeck Spring Jiu Jitsu 4 0 75 * 50–100 4 0 0 06:30 Avg 01:38
1 Romeo Arslan Helios Project 1 0 75 * 50–100 1 0 0 03:00 Avg 03:00
1 Salakhuddin Bulhakov JSJ ACADEMY 2 0 75 * 50–100 2 0 0 03:17 Avg 01:39
1 Sayfulah Takaev La Cage Coaching 2 0 75 * 50–100 1 1 0 04:40 Avg 02:20
1 Semih Altindal POUND FOR POUND TEAM 1 0 75 * 50–100 1 0 0 03:00 Avg 03:00
1 Shea Williams Trident Martial Arts Uk 3 0 75 * 50–100 2 1 0 07:12 Avg 02:24
1 Temirlan Valiyev Moka Team 443 6 0 75 * 50–100 6 0 0 05:33 Avg 00:56
1 Tymur Tebidze POUND FOR POUND TEAM 4 0 75 * 50–100 4 0 0 05:55 Avg 01:29
1 Tyson Kwiatkowski CHECKMAT INTERNATIONAL 4 0 75 * 50–100 4 0 0 04:33 Avg 01:08
1 Wassim Touil INVICTUS TEAM BJJ 2 0 75 * 50–100 0 2 0 08:00 Avg 04:00
44 Andrew Perez Predators MMA and BJJ Academy Manchester 7 1 68.8 * 43.8–93.8 3 4 0 23:22 Avg 02:55
44 Lucas Figueira Ruffnecks BJJ · TRIDENT BJJ Swindon 5 1 68.8 * 43.8–93.8 5 0 0 07:08 Avg 01:11
44 Mihai Gheghici ABSOLUTO BJJ ( ROMANIA ) 7 1 68.8 * 43.8–93.8 5 2 0 17:07 Avg 02:08
47 Artem Morozov Sport Club Achilles (Finland) 5 1 66.7 * 41.7–91.7 3 2 0 17:09 Avg 02:52
47 George Udesiani Mma Nürnberg e.V. 4 1 66.7 * 41.7–91.7 3 1 0 10:52 Avg 02:10
47 Illia Menkov POUND FOR POUND TEAM 5 1 66.7 * 41.7–91.7 2 3 0 18:16 Avg 03:03
47 Issa DYA CDK TEAM 5 1 66.7 * 41.7–91.7 4 1 0 10:34 Avg 01:46

Team performance

Academy results

The academy score uses the same result, native pre-event opponent rating and missing-rating range, then gives every athlete with an assessable external result equal weight. A numbered academy position requires at least three assessed athletes and a complete team basis. The # column is the position by calculated score. Historical support is the weighted share of opponent ratings that met the publication evidence rules; it is descriptive, not a confidence percentage. Matches between teammates stay outside the score; W-L and mat time still include them.

Athlete coverage compares scored public athletes with active public participants in indexed youth divisions. Rating coverage concerns valid indexed outcomes only and does not claim every source match was imported.

A match side without one clear academy registration is omitted. Unknown formats and matches without two clear academy registrations remain unassessed. A missing native opponent rating uses the provisional midpoint and widens the displayed range.

166
Academy results
# Academy W L S P X Mat time
1/1 athlete assessed

IMPACT AIX-EN-PROVENCE

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

3 3 3 0 0 15:22
1/1 athlete assessed

Impacto Team Stuttgart

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 1 0 1 0 06:00
1/1 athlete assessed

JJB Yverdon

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

2 2 1 1 0 13:41
1/1 athlete assessed

Polar Jiu Jitsu Team

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 1 0 1 0 06:00
2/2 athletes assessed

Renegade MMA

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

2 1 0 2 0 08:53
1/1 athlete assessed

Team impact

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 1 0 1 0 06:00
1/1 athlete assessed

Team Unbreakable Belgium

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 1 0 1 0 08:00
3/4 athletes assessed

Top Brother Europe

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

3 3 1 2 0 16:29
1/2 athlete assessed

Triangle Jiu-Jitsu Münster

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

2 2 2 0 0 03:56
1/1 athlete assessed

Wolfpack Academy

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

3 1 2 1 0 13:56
1/1 athlete assessed

Wolfpack Karlsruhe

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 1 1 0 0 03:45
6/6 athletes assessed

Helios Project

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

6 5 4 2 0 34:14
6/6 athletes assessed

Kingdom JJ

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

9 8 4 4 1 40:20
5/5 athletes assessed

Martial Arts Diez e.V.

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

7 8 3 4 0 33:29
4/5 athletes assessed

Nexus Fighter Academy

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

3 7 2 0 1 20:42
8/8 athletes assessed

WingTsun Gera

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

7 8 2 5 0 33:21
7/8 athletes assessed

Sport Club Achilles (Finland)

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

15 12 9 6 0 1:07:27
3/5 athletes assessed

Carlson Gracie Luxembourg

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

5 3 5 0 0 17:18
2/2 athletes assessed

P.S.L.P.B CICERO COSTHA

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

4 4 3 1 0 15:46
1/1 athlete assessed

School of champs

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

2 5 1 1 0 11:08
20/20 athletes assessed

MatSide Romania

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

28 37 17 9 2 2:14:15
2/2 athletes assessed

Fight Fusion

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

3 4 1 1 1 21:26
3/3 athletes assessed

Copa kids Poznań

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

4 5 4 0 0 19:10
3/3 athletes assessed

GFTeam Academia Braunschweig

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

4 2 2 1 1 18:34
1/2 athlete assessed

GFTeam Berlin

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 2 0 0 1 12:00
1/1 athlete assessed

Renzo Gracie Prague

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

2 2 1 1 0 10:01
3/3 athletes assessed

Mma Nürnberg e.V.

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

4 6 3 1 0 26:24
3/4 athletes assessed

Jaypee Gym

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

4 10 1 3 0 33:45
1/1 athlete assessed

Armadillos Lemgo

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 3 0 0 1 15:45
2/2 athletes assessed

Atos Germany

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 2 1 0 0 07:39
2/2 athletes assessed

Clube de Jiu Jitsu Pitbull Czech Republic

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

2 4 0 1 1 17:06
2/3 athletes assessed

GFT Ludwigshafen/Elite Fight Academy

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 3 0 1 0 10:24
2/3 athletes assessed

gracie barra anderlecht

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

4 6 3 1 0 20:46
1/1 athlete assessed

Green Grappler Whv

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 2 0 1 0 08:29
2/2 athletes assessed

Klub Jiu Jitsu Žiar nad Hronom

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

2 4 0 2 0 18:44
2/2 athletes assessed

Next Generation MMA Liverpool

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

2 6 0 2 0 14:33
2/3 athletes assessed

Stallion Gym

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 3 0 1 0 05:18
2/3 athletes assessed

TeamXtreme

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

2 5 1 1 0 15:47
1/1 athlete assessed

THE STRONGEST

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 3 1 0 0 15:18
2/2 athletes assessed

TORINO KOMBAT

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 2 0 1 0 09:00
1/2 athlete assessed

TV Gladenbach Jiu Jitsu

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 2 0 1 0 06:28
3/3 athletes assessed

Umann bjj

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

4 8 3 1 0 25:56
2/2 athletes assessed

SPORT ATTITUDE 78

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

2 5 2 0 0 20:53
10/10 athletes assessed

1.BJJC Kurama Offenbach 2021 e.V.

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

7 15 6 1 0 56:12
2/2 athletes assessed

AJP ACADEMIE JACKSON PAULO

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

3 6 3 0 0 21:42
5/7 athletes assessed

ROLLING RASCALS, Ramstein Bjj

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

5 13 3 2 0 29:10
6/8 athletes assessed

COMBAT BROTHERS

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

1 17 0 1 0 46:39
1/1 athlete assessed

Akita-Inu-Dojo

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

0 1 0 0 0 04:00
1/1 athlete assessed

Armbar Akademie

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

0 2 0 0 0 06:00
1/1 athlete assessed

BJJ ZH

Supported opposition: 0% (weighted). This is not a confidence percentage.

The compared score bands vary only missing native-format opponent ratings. Known ratings and event results can also contain uncertainty.

No academy position: at least 3 assessed athletes are required.

No academy position: one or more known completed results could not be assessed.

0 1 0 0 0 04:00