Julian Sinkevic

W–L: 1–1
Gi: -
No-Gi: 1,218
Current form: 1–1
Opponents: 2

Indexed career

Matches

Indexed competition matches
Date	Opponent	Result	Event	Division
2026-05-02	Pedro Kunz	Loss	2026 AGF Saarbrucken Championships	No-Gi · No Gi Kids / Boys / Teen (14 - 15 yrs) / White / Heavy I (Up to 72.60 kg)
Opponent rating 1,373 Expected win chance 41% Current estimated model contribution Rating influence The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. Because this No-Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Current rating influence ≈ −38 The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. Because this No-Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. Calculation details This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Opponent rating 1,373 Effective opponent evidence 2.9 Opponent rating status Provisional Expected win chance 41% Result Loss Format No-Gi Athlete’s No-Gi rating 2 rated matches · Provisional Evidence weight 0.84 Same-event matches 2 Meetings with this opponent 1 Duration 04:00 Round 2 Score 4–13 Academy during event Matrix Jiu-Jitsu
2026-05-02	Birk Fusenig	Win	2026 AGF Saarbrucken Championships	No-Gi · No Gi Kids / Boys / Teen (14 - 15 yrs) / White / Heavy I (Up to 72.60 kg)
Opponent rating 1,198 Expected win chance 45% Current estimated model contribution Rating influence This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. Because this No-Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Current rating influence ≈ +51 This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. Because this No-Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. Calculation details This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Opponent rating 1,198 Effective opponent evidence 4.0 Opponent rating status Established Expected win chance 45% Result Win Format No-Gi Athlete’s No-Gi rating 2 rated matches · Provisional Evidence weight 0.84 Same-event matches 2 Meetings with this opponent 1 Duration 04:00 Round 1 Score 12–2 Academy during event Matrix Jiu-Jitsu