Julius Lind

W–L: 1–1
Gi: 1,196
No-Gi: -
Current form: 1–1
Opponents: 2

Indexed career

Matches

Indexed competition matches
Date	Opponent	Result	Event	Division
2026-06-06	Nylo Van Beek	Loss	Cauliflower Cup Circuit 2	Gi · Boys Gi / Grey / Pee Wee II (8yrs) / -27,20 kg
Opponent rating 1,385 Expected win chance 51% Current estimated model contribution Rating influence The loss weighs more negatively because the athlete was favored. Because this Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Current rating influence ≈ −51 The loss weighs more negatively because the athlete was favored. Because this Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. Calculation details This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Opponent rating 1,385 Effective opponent evidence 16.6 Opponent rating status Established Expected win chance 51% Result Loss Format Gi Athlete’s Gi rating 2 rated matches · Provisional Evidence weight 0.84 Same-event matches 2 Meetings with this opponent 1 Duration 05:00 Round 2 Score 2–8 Academy during event TEAM AGUA
2026-06-06	Azad Herzallah	Win	Cauliflower Cup Circuit 2	Gi · Boys Gi / Grey / Pee Wee II (8yrs) / -27,20 kg
Opponent rating 1,138 Expected win chance 58% Current estimated model contribution Rating influence The win supports a higher rating, but less strongly because the athlete was favored. Because this Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Current rating influence ≈ +43 The win supports a higher rating, but less strongly because the athlete was favored. Because this Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. Calculation details This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Opponent rating 1,138 Effective opponent evidence 5.0 Opponent rating status Established Expected win chance 58% Result Win Format Gi Athlete’s Gi rating 2 rated matches · Provisional Evidence weight 0.84 Same-event matches 2 Meetings with this opponent 1 Duration 05:00 Round 1 Score 22–0 Academy during event TEAM AGUA