- W–L
- 6–4 Won and lost rating-eligible matches in the past 12 months.
- Gi
- 1,308 Rating based on Gi matches in the past 12 months.
- No-Gi
- 1,314 Rating based on No-Gi matches in the past 12 months.
- Current form
- 6–4 Results from the ten most recent rating-eligible matches.
- Opponents
- 5 Unique opponents faced in rating-eligible matches in the past 12 months.
Indexed career
Matches
| Date | Opponent | Result | Event | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-04 | Khalid Eskendarov |
Loss
|
2026 AGF Hamburg Summer Open | No-Gi · No Gi Kids Challenger / Boys / Regular Challenger / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) No-Gi ≤34 kg |
|
||||
| 2026-07-04 | Ahmad Sakaev |
Loss
|
2026 AGF Hamburg Summer Open | No-Gi · No Gi Kids Challenger / Boys / Regular Challenger / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) No-Gi ≤34 kg |
|
||||
| 2026-07-04 | Dzans Polats Safarov |
Win
|
2026 AGF Hamburg Summer Open | No-Gi · No Gi Kids Challenger / Boys / Regular Challenger / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) No-Gi ≤34 kg |
|
||||
| 2026-07-04 | Konstantin Ohrmann |
Win
|
2026 AGF Hamburg Summer Open | No-Gi · No Gi Kids / Boys / Pre Teen (10 - 11 yrs) / Gray / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) No-Gi 10–11 yo grey ≤34 kg |
|
||||
| 2026-07-04 | Khalid Eskendarov |
Win
|
2026 AGF Hamburg Summer Open | No-Gi · No Gi Kids / Boys / Pre Teen (10 - 11 yrs) / Gray / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) No-Gi 10–11 yo grey ≤34 kg |
|
||||
| 2026-07-04 | Khalid Eskendarov |
Win
|
2026 AGF Hamburg Summer Open | Gi · Gi Kids Challenger / Boys / Regular Challenger / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) Gi ≤34 kg |
|
||||
| 2026-07-04 | Ahmad Sakaev |
Loss
|
2026 AGF Hamburg Summer Open | Gi · Gi Kids Challenger / Boys / Regular Challenger / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) Gi ≤34 kg |
|
||||
| 2026-07-04 | Konstantin Ohrmann |
Win
|
2026 AGF Hamburg Summer Open | Gi · Gi Kids Challenger / Boys / Regular Challenger / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) Gi ≤34 kg |
|
||||
| 2026-07-04 | Amir Rahimi |
Win
|
2026 AGF Hamburg Summer Open | Gi · Gi Kids / Boys / Pre Teen (10 - 11 yrs) / Gray / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) Gi 10–11 yo grey ≤34 kg |
|
||||
| 2026-07-04 | Khalid Eskendarov |
Loss
|
2026 AGF Hamburg Summer Open | Gi · Gi Kids / Boys / Pre Teen (10 - 11 yrs) / Gray / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) Gi 10–11 yo grey ≤34 kg |
|
||||
against Khalid Eskendarov
No-Gi · No Gi Kids Challenger / Boys / Regular Challenger / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) No-Gi ≤34 kg
Match details
- Opponent rating
- 1,376
- Expected win chance
- 34%
- Current estimated model contribution
- Rating influence
Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event. The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.Current rating influence ≈ −12
The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.
The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event.
The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times.
Calculation details
This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.
Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.
- Opponent rating
- 1,376
- Effective opponent evidence
- 8.1
- Opponent rating status
- Established
- Expected win chance
- 34%
- Result
- Loss
- Format
- No-Gi
- Evidence weight
- 0.47
- Same-event matches
- 5
- Meetings with this opponent
- 2
- Duration
- 03:00
- Round
- 3
- Score
- 0–2
- Academy during event
- Föreningen Redline
against Ahmad Sakaev
No-Gi · No Gi Kids Challenger / Boys / Regular Challenger / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) No-Gi ≤34 kg
Match details
- Opponent rating
- 1,472
- Expected win chance
- 32%
- Current estimated model contribution
- Rating influence
Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.Current rating influence ≈ −12
The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.
The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event.
Calculation details
This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.
Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.
- Opponent rating
- 1,472
- Effective opponent evidence
- 11.1
- Opponent rating status
- Established
- Expected win chance
- 32%
- Result
- Loss
- Format
- No-Gi
- Evidence weight
- 0.67
- Same-event matches
- 5
- Meetings with this opponent
- 1
- Duration
- 03:00
- Round
- 2
- Score
- 2–3
- Academy during event
- Föreningen Redline
against Dzans Polats Safarov
No-Gi · No Gi Kids Challenger / Boys / Regular Challenger / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) No-Gi ≤34 kg
Match details
- Opponent rating
- 1,367
- Expected win chance
- 43%
- Current estimated model contribution
- Rating influence
Current rating influence: This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.Current rating influence ≈ +15
This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating.
The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event.
Calculation details
This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.
Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.
- Opponent rating
- 1,367
- Effective opponent evidence
- 11.5
- Opponent rating status
- Established
- Expected win chance
- 43%
- Result
- Win
- Format
- No-Gi
- Evidence weight
- 0.67
- Same-event matches
- 5
- Meetings with this opponent
- 1
- Duration
- 02:57
- Round
- 1
- Score
- 0–2
- Academy during event
- Föreningen Redline
against Konstantin Ohrmann
Match details
- Opponent rating
- 1,500
- Expected win chance
- 27%
- Current estimated model contribution
- Rating influence
Current rating influence: This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.Current rating influence ≈ +19
This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating.
The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event.
Calculation details
This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.
Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.
- Opponent rating
- 1,500
- Effective opponent evidence
- 24.1
- Opponent rating status
- Established
- Expected win chance
- 27%
- Result
- Win
- Format
- No-Gi
- Evidence weight
- 0.67
- Same-event matches
- 5
- Meetings with this opponent
- 1
- Duration
- 02:04
- Round
- 3
- Score
- 6–2
- Academy during event
- Föreningen Redline
against Khalid Eskendarov
Match details
- Opponent rating
- 1,376
- Expected win chance
- 34%
- Current estimated model contribution
- Rating influence
Current rating influence: This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event. The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.Current rating influence ≈ +12
This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating.
The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event.
The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times.
Calculation details
This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.
Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.
- Opponent rating
- 1,376
- Effective opponent evidence
- 8.1
- Opponent rating status
- Established
- Expected win chance
- 34%
- Result
- Win
- Format
- No-Gi
- Evidence weight
- 0.47
- Same-event matches
- 5
- Meetings with this opponent
- 2
- Duration
- 01:17
- Round
- 2
- Score
- 5–0
- Academy during event
- Föreningen Redline
against Khalid Eskendarov
Gi · Gi Kids Challenger / Boys / Regular Challenger / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) Gi ≤34 kg
Match details
- Opponent rating
- 1,397
- Expected win chance
- 38%
- Current estimated model contribution
- Rating influence
Current rating influence: This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event. The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.Current rating influence ≈ +13
This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating.
The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event.
The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times.
Calculation details
This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.
Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.
- Opponent rating
- 1,397
- Effective opponent evidence
- 9.0
- Opponent rating status
- Established
- Expected win chance
- 38%
- Result
- Win
- Format
- Gi
- Evidence weight
- 0.47
- Same-event matches
- 5
- Meetings with this opponent
- 2
- Duration
- 03:00
- Round
- 3
- Score
- 10–2
- Academy during event
- Föreningen Redline
against Ahmad Sakaev
Gi · Gi Kids Challenger / Boys / Regular Challenger / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) Gi ≤34 kg
Match details
- Opponent rating
- 1,572
- Expected win chance
- 23%
- Current estimated model contribution
- Rating influence
Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.Current rating influence ≈ −9
The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.
The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event.
Calculation details
This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.
Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.
- Opponent rating
- 1,572
- Effective opponent evidence
- 15.4
- Opponent rating status
- Established
- Expected win chance
- 23%
- Result
- Loss
- Format
- Gi
- Evidence weight
- 0.67
- Same-event matches
- 5
- Meetings with this opponent
- 1
- Duration
- 03:00
- Round
- 2
- Score
- 0–2
- Academy during event
- Föreningen Redline
against Konstantin Ohrmann
Gi · Gi Kids Challenger / Boys / Regular Challenger / Feather II (Up to 34.00 kg) Gi ≤34 kg
Match details
- Opponent rating
- 1,552
- Expected win chance
- 21%
- Current estimated model contribution
- Rating influence
Current rating influence: This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.Current rating influence ≈ +23
This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating.
The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event.
Calculation details
This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.
Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.
- Opponent rating
- 1,552
- Effective opponent evidence
- 24.0
- Opponent rating status
- Established
- Expected win chance
- 21%
- Result
- Win
- Format
- Gi
- Evidence weight
- 0.67
- Same-event matches
- 5
- Meetings with this opponent
- 1
- Duration
- 03:00
- Round
- 1
- Score
- 5–0
- Academy during event
- Föreningen Redline
against Amir Rahimi
Match details
- Opponent rating
- 1,102
- Expected win chance
- 57%
- Current estimated model contribution
- Rating influence
Current rating influence: The win supports a higher rating, but less strongly because the athlete was favored. The win supports a higher rating, but less strongly because the athlete was favored. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.Current rating influence ≈ +8
The win supports a higher rating, but less strongly because the athlete was favored.
The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event.
Calculation details
This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.
Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.
- Opponent rating
- 1,102
- Effective opponent evidence
- 4.6
- Opponent rating status
- Established
- Expected win chance
- 57%
- Result
- Win
- Format
- Gi
- Evidence weight
- 0.67
- Same-event matches
- 5
- Meetings with this opponent
- 1
- Duration
- 00:51
- Round
- 1
- Score
- 1–2
- Academy during event
- Föreningen Redline
against Khalid Eskendarov
Match details
- Opponent rating
- 1,397
- Expected win chance
- 38%
- Current estimated model contribution
- Rating influence
Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event. The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.Current rating influence ≈ −12
The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.
The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event.
The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times.
Calculation details
This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.
Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.
- Opponent rating
- 1,397
- Effective opponent evidence
- 9.0
- Opponent rating status
- Established
- Expected win chance
- 38%
- Result
- Loss
- Format
- Gi
- Evidence weight
- 0.47
- Same-event matches
- 5
- Meetings with this opponent
- 2
- Duration
- 03:00
- Round
- 1
- Score
- 0–1
- Academy during event
- Föreningen Redline
No indexed matches were found for this search.