Quin Van Lohuizen

W–L: 1–2
Gi: 1,169
No-Gi: -
Current form: 1–2
Opponents: 3

Indexed career

Matches

Indexed competition matches
Date	Opponent	Result	Event	Division
2026-05-09	Nadir Jerrayi	Win	Lion Cub Jiu Jitsu Competition 6	Gi · Boys GI / 13 - 15 years old (DAY 1: Saturday) / White belt / -60 & 65 kg
Opponent rating 1,100 Expected win chance 55% Current estimated model contribution Rating influence The win supports a higher rating, but less strongly because the athlete was favored. Because this Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Current rating influence ≈ +36 The win supports a higher rating, but less strongly because the athlete was favored. Because this Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. Calculation details This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Opponent rating 1,100 Effective opponent evidence 2.3 Opponent rating status Provisional Expected win chance 55% Result Win Format Gi Athlete’s Gi rating 3 rated matches · Provisional Evidence weight 0.76 Same-event matches 3 Meetings with this opponent 1 Duration 02:14 Round 3 Score 10–0 Academy during event Renzo Gracie Holland
2026-05-09	Siebe Van Den Beemd	Loss	Lion Cub Jiu Jitsu Competition 6	Gi · Boys GI / 13 - 15 years old (DAY 1: Saturday) / White belt / -60 & 65 kg
Opponent rating 1,269 Expected win chance 60% Current estimated model contribution Rating influence The loss weighs more negatively because the athlete was favored. Because this Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Current rating influence ≈ −46 The loss weighs more negatively because the athlete was favored. Because this Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. Calculation details This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Opponent rating 1,269 Effective opponent evidence 2.3 Opponent rating status Provisional Expected win chance 60% Result Loss Format Gi Athlete’s Gi rating 3 rated matches · Provisional Evidence weight 0.76 Same-event matches 3 Meetings with this opponent 1 Duration 01:39 Round 2 Score 0–15 Academy during event Renzo Gracie Holland
2026-05-09	Ravi Oerlemans	Loss	Lion Cub Jiu Jitsu Competition 6	Gi · Boys GI / 13 - 15 years old (DAY 1: Saturday) / White belt / -60 & 65 kg
Opponent rating 1,366 Expected win chance 49% Current estimated model contribution Rating influence The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. Because this Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Current rating influence ≈ −26 The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. Because this Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. Calculation details This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Opponent rating 1,366 Effective opponent evidence 4.6 Opponent rating status Established Expected win chance 49% Result Loss Format Gi Athlete’s Gi rating 3 rated matches · Provisional Evidence weight 0.76 Same-event matches 3 Meetings with this opponent 1 Duration 02:36 Round 1 Score 0–8 Academy during event Renzo Gracie Holland