Tyron GOMES LIMA

W–L: 1–1
Gi: -
No-Gi: 1,218
Current form: 1–1
Opponents: 2

Indexed career

Matches

Indexed competition matches
Date	Opponent	Result	Event	Division
2026-04-05	David Lavrencsik	Loss	GrappleCity: Luxembourg Spring Open	No-Gi · Teens NoGi / White / 14-15 years / -65kg / Boy
Opponent rating 1,416 Expected win chance 37% Current estimated model contribution Rating influence The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. Because this No-Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Current rating influence ≈ −34 The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. Because this No-Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. Calculation details This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Opponent rating 1,416 Effective opponent evidence 4.4 Opponent rating status Established Expected win chance 37% Result Loss Format No-Gi Athlete’s No-Gi rating 2 rated matches · Provisional Evidence weight 0.84 Same-event matches 2 Meetings with this opponent 1 Duration 04:00 Round 2 Score 0–21 Academy during event Veras Academy Luxembourg
2026-04-05	Noah Geib	Win	GrappleCity: Luxembourg Spring Open	No-Gi · Teens NoGi / White / 14-15 years / -65kg / Boy
Opponent rating 1,185 Expected win chance 52% Current estimated model contribution Rating influence The win supports a higher rating, but less strongly because the athlete was favored. Because this No-Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Current rating influence ≈ +48 The win supports a higher rating, but less strongly because the athlete was favored. Because this No-Gi rating is still provisional, individual matches can have relatively more influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. Calculation details This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete. Opponent rating 1,185 Effective opponent evidence 4.7 Opponent rating status Established Expected win chance 52% Result Win Format No-Gi Athlete’s No-Gi rating 2 rated matches · Provisional Evidence weight 0.84 Same-event matches 2 Meetings with this opponent 1 Duration 00:05 Round 1 Score 0–0 Academy during event Veras Academy Luxembourg