Yassine Bachri

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Duration

00:08

Round

1

Score

0–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Outside the current rating period

Opponent rating

1,169

Expected win chance

21%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −7 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −7

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,169

Effective opponent evidence

1.7

Opponent rating status

Provisional

Expected win chance

21%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.84

Same-event matches

2

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

03:00

Round

3

Score

0–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,290

Expected win chance

22%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −5 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −5

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,290

Effective opponent evidence

6.2

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

22%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.76

Same-event matches

3

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

03:00

Round

2

Score

2–5

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,173

Expected win chance

23%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −7 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −7

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,173

Effective opponent evidence

1.7

Opponent rating status

Provisional

Expected win chance

23%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.84

Same-event matches

2

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

00:34

Round

1

Score

0–3

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,291

Expected win chance

24%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −5 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −5

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,291

Effective opponent evidence

3.9

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

24%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.84

Same-event matches

2

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

02:07

Round

1

Score

0–2

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,275

Expected win chance

41%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −4 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −4

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,275

Effective opponent evidence

5.6

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

41%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.84

Same-event matches

2

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

00:34

Round

2

Score

0–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,250

Expected win chance

20%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ +16 Current rating influence: This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ +16

This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,250

Effective opponent evidence

5.0

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

20%

Result

Win

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.84

Same-event matches

2

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

03:00

Round

1

Score

5–1

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,189

Expected win chance

39%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −8 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −8

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,189

Effective opponent evidence

4.0

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

39%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.76

Same-event matches

3

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

01:52

Round

3

Score

0–7

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,262

Expected win chance

21%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −5 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −5

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,262

Effective opponent evidence

4.6

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

21%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.76

Same-event matches

3

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

03:00

Round

2

Score

0–5

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,227

Expected win chance

23%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −5 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −5

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,227

Effective opponent evidence

2.3

Opponent rating status

Provisional

Expected win chance

23%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.76

Same-event matches

3

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

01:55

Round

1

Score

0–7

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,489

Expected win chance

18%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,489

Effective opponent evidence

7.0

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

18%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

01:03

Round

3

Score

0–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,267

Expected win chance

46%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −4 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −4

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,267

Effective opponent evidence

7.6

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

46%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

00:26

Round

3

Score

0–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,276

Expected win chance

38%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −2 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −2

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,276

Effective opponent evidence

2.8

Opponent rating status

Provisional

Expected win chance

38%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

01:37

Round

2

Score

0–6

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,056

Expected win chance

38%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ +10 Current rating influence: This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ +10

This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,056

Effective opponent evidence

2.8

Opponent rating status

Provisional

Expected win chance

38%

Result

Win

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

02:31

Round

1

Score

6–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,182

Expected win chance

22%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −7 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −7

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,182

Effective opponent evidence

5.2

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

22%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

01:28

Round

2

Score

0–7

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,347

Expected win chance

17%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −4 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −4

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,347

Effective opponent evidence

6.1

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

17%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.76

Same-event matches

3

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

00:37

Round

2

Score

0–6

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,526

Expected win chance

14%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,526

Effective opponent evidence

14.1

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

14%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.84

Same-event matches

2

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

00:27

Round

2

Score

0–2

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,204

Expected win chance

27%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −4 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −4

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,204

Effective opponent evidence

1.7

Opponent rating status

Provisional

Expected win chance

27%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.84

Same-event matches

2

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

01:01

Round

1

Score

0–3

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,628

Expected win chance

15%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,628

Effective opponent evidence

24.4

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

15%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

00:54

Round

2

Score

0–7

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,339

Expected win chance

29%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −3 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −3

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,339

Effective opponent evidence

6.3

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

29%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.84

Same-event matches

2

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

03:00

Round

1

Score

0–6

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Round

3

Score

0–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Outside the current rating period

Opponent rating

1,282

Expected win chance

20%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −6 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −6

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,282

Effective opponent evidence

6.3

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

20%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.84

Same-event matches

2

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

01:31

Round

1

Score

0–9

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,340

Expected win chance

11%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −4 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −4

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,340

Effective opponent evidence

4.1

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

11%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

01:17

Round

3

Score

0–13

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,348

Expected win chance

21%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −6 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −6

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,348

Effective opponent evidence

18.3

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

21%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

03:00

Round

2

Score

0–3

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,228

Expected win chance

50%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −4 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event. The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −4

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 5 rated matches at this event.

The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,228

Effective opponent evidence

13.5

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

50%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.47

Same-event matches

5

Meetings with this opponent

2

Duration

01:29

Round

3

Score

0–11

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,288

Expected win chance

20%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −1 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −1

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,288

Effective opponent evidence

3.4

Opponent rating status

Provisional

Expected win chance

20%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

00:36

Round

2

Score

0–2

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,230

Expected win chance

45%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −3 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −3

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,230

Effective opponent evidence

4.0

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

45%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.50

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

2

Duration

01:25

Round

2

Score

0–5

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,230

Expected win chance

45%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −3 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −3

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,230

Effective opponent evidence

4.0

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

45%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.50

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

2

Duration

01:11

Round

1

Score

0–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,074

Expected win chance

17%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ +14 Current rating influence: This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ +14

This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,074

Effective opponent evidence

1.7

Opponent rating status

Provisional

Expected win chance

17%

Result

Win

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

02:03

Round

2

Score

7–1

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,245

Expected win chance

17%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −4 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −4

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,245

Effective opponent evidence

1.7

Opponent rating status

Provisional

Expected win chance

17%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

01:40

Round

1

Score

0–15

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,077

Expected win chance

36%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −10 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −10

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,077

Effective opponent evidence

7.0

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

36%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

03:00

Round

4

Score

0–8

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,593

Expected win chance

4%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −2 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −2

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,593

Effective opponent evidence

12.1

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

4%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

00:24

Round

3

Score

0–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,273

Expected win chance

18%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −5 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −5

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,273

Effective opponent evidence

5.6

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

18%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

01:55

Round

2

Score

0–9

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,127

Expected win chance

17%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ +14 Current rating influence: This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ +14

This win exceeded the model’s expectation, so it supports a higher rating.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 4 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,127

Effective opponent evidence

2.3

Opponent rating status

Provisional

Expected win chance

17%

Result

Win

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.71

Same-event matches

4

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

03:00

Round

1

Score

13–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Result

Loss

Format

youth_ratings.formats.conflict

Duration

02:03

Round

3

Score

2–7

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Outside the current rating period

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Result

Loss

Format

youth_ratings.formats.conflict

Duration

00:34

Round

2

Score

0–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Outside the current rating period

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Result

Loss

Format

youth_ratings.formats.conflict

Duration

02:12

Round

1

Score

0–4

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Outside the current rating period

Opponent rating

1,122

Expected win chance

51%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ +10 Current rating influence: The win supports a higher rating, but less strongly because the athlete was favored. The win supports a higher rating, but less strongly because the athlete was favored. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ +10

The win supports a higher rating, but less strongly because the athlete was favored.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,122

Effective opponent evidence

11.3

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

51%

Result

Win

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.76

Same-event matches

3

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

01:04

Round

1

Score

2–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,429

Expected win chance

19%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −2 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −2

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,429

Effective opponent evidence

12.2

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

19%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.76

Same-event matches

3

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

01:00

Round

3

Score

0–9

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,228

Expected win chance

40%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −4 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −4

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event.

The evidence weight is lower because these athletes met 2 times.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,228

Effective opponent evidence

13.5

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

40%

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.54

Same-event matches

3

Meetings with this opponent

2

Duration

00:35

Round

2

Score

2–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,378

Expected win chance

15%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −4 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −4

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 3 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,378

Effective opponent evidence

11.6

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

15%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.76

Same-event matches

3

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

01:05

Round

2

Score

0–7

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Opponent rating

1,302

Expected win chance

23%

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ −7 Current rating influence: The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence. The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ −7

The stronger opponent reduces the negative influence.

The evidence weight is lower because this athlete had 2 rated matches at this event.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Opponent rating

1,302

Effective opponent evidence

14.5

Opponent rating status

Established

Expected win chance

23%

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Evidence weight

0.84

Same-event matches

2

Meetings with this opponent

1

Duration

02:34

Round

1

Score

2–2

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Duration

01:03

Round

2

Score

0–4

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Outside the current rating period

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Duration

00:41

Round

1

Score

0–6

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Outside the current rating period

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Result

Win

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Duration

02:40

Round

2

Score

2–2

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Outside the current rating period

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Duration

00:59

Round

1

Score

0–7

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Outside the current rating period

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Duration

01:23

Round

3

Score

0–5

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Outside the current rating period

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Result

Win

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Round

2

Score

0–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Outside the current rating period

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Result

Loss

Format

Gi

Athlete’s Gi rating

20 rated matches · Established

Duration

03:00

Round

2

Score

0–0

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Outside the current rating period

Current estimated model contribution

Rating influence

≈ 0 Current rating influence: This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches. Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Current rating influence ≈ 0

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Calculation details

This number estimates how much the published Overall rating would differ if this match were omitted. It is not a points transaction and cannot be added to other matches.

Later results can change this estimate when the model learns more about either athlete.

Result

Loss

Format

No-Gi

Athlete’s No-Gi rating

17 rated matches · Established

Duration

03:00

Round

3

Score

0–2

Academy during event

Gracie Barra Utrecht

Outside the current rating period